TEACHING-LEARNING AND EVALUATION 2.1 – Student Enrollment and Profile 2.1.12.1.1.12.1.22.1.2.12.1.1 2.1.1 – Enrolment Number Number of students admitted during the year 2.1.1.1 2.1.1.1 – Number of sanctioned seats during the year 2.1.2 2.1.2 – Number of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST,OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy during the year (exclusive of supernumerary seats) 2.1.2.1 2.1.2.1 – Number of actual students admitted from the reserved categories during the year 2.2 – Catering to Student Diversity 2.2.12.2.22.2.1 2.2.1 – The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organizes special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners 2.2.2 2.2.2 – Student- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) 2.3 – Teaching- Learning Process 2.3.12.3.22.3.32.3.3.12.3.1 2.3.1 – Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences 2.3.2 2.3.2 – Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process. Writedescription in maximum of 200 words 2.3.3 2.3.3 – Ratio of mentor to students for academic and other related issues (Data forthe latest completed academic year ) 2.3.3.1 2.3.3.1 – Number of mentors 2.4 – Teacher Profile and Quality 2.4.12.4.22.4.2.12.4.32.4.3.12.4.1 2.4.1 – Number of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the year 2.4.2 2.4.2 – Number of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. /D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the year (consider only highest degree for count) 2.4.2.1 2.4.2.1 – Number of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. /D.N.C Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the year 2.4.3 2.4.3 – Number of years of teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution (Data for the latest completed academic year) 2.4.3.1 2.4.3.1 – Total experience of full-time teachers 2.5 – Evaluation Process and Reforms 2.5.12.5.22.5.1 2.5.1 – Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode. Write description within 200 words. 2.5.2 2.5.2 – Mechanism to deal with internal examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient